Thursday, June 30, 2022
Rowan Recommends: 5 Great Albums From 5 Underrated Genres
Thursday, June 9, 2022
Apocryphal Arguments #3: Parmenides & The Way of Truth
This is the third post in a series I'm calling the Apocryphal Arguments series. The idea is to briefly outline, explain, and defend a simple philosophical argument that I think is plausible. It will be in the form of precise premises and conclusions in order to maximise legibility. I aim to post only novel, interesting, and even ridiculous-sounding arguments that might question fundamental sensibilities in order to maximise impact. If all goes to plan each post should be a fun ride.
I want to outline here an
infamous argument, one that seems beyond merely apocryphal. It is an argument that also happens to be
the oldest remaining sustained (and substantive) written argument in the tradition of
western philosophy. (All other works are almost all lost before this period.) It is also the first work of a philosopher that really drew me in, in a way that nothing had before. Thus, I have a particular affinity for it and the careful reader of my metaphysical works will see that its tendrils still reach their way into my thought to this day. Though one (regrettable) disclaimer I have is that it will be rather more obscure than my previous entries in this series. It just fits the bill so well that I couldn’t put it here as merely another post. Thus, if you are a new reader or not that interested in metaphysics, I recommend reading the previous entries in the series, which you can find here and here. You can also read my arguing along Parmenidean lines for a Being of absolute positivity here.